Evaluation
Japans Sustainability Down 19% (since 1990)
JFS has chosen 20 headline indicators for sustainability
and made the first numerical evaluation of national
sustainability for Japan. Results show a score
of 33.5 for 2005 in relation to a hypothetical
perfect score of 100 projected for 2050, down
about 19% from 41.3 points for 1990. The overall
analysis of the estimation shows that sustainability
in Japan has rather declined than improved, though
some of indicators have shown improvement.

1.Nature
There are many challenges concerning nature,
as efforts by various sectors in recent years
concerning climate change, resource cycling and
wastes have not led to better numerical values.
However, the overall point has improved slightly
since 1990, reflecting increase in green consumerism,
society-wide increase in environmental awareness
and overall improvement in condition of water,
soil and air. Though the sustainability has not
improved in terms of environmental impact, we
made positive evaluation considering the steadfast
improvement in environmental literacy, and hoping
for further improvement. Among headline indicators,
climate change is the most urgent issue at present.
2. Economy
The overall score deteriorated since 1990, reflecting
massive debt accumulation, which is a major issue
bearing on fairness to coming generations. In
light of a sustainable and self-supporting economy,
extremely low self-sufficiency in food and energy
remains major problem indigenous to Japan and
further improvement in resource-productivity is
needed. Though Japans economy is big in
scale, the overall score is the lowest of all
four categories in terms of sustainability. Future
issues for our rapidly graying society include
how to build new value systems and how to achieve
a paradigm shift from a growth-geared economy
to a sustainable one.
3. Society
Participation in society by women improved since
1990, though remaining low relative to international
standard, which is favorable trend in view of
diversification. The advent of investment style
such as SRI, socially responsible investment,
is another encouraging sign of social change,
though the scale is still small compared to those
of Western countries. However, as for culture
and tradition, traditional industries that have
figured prominently in creating Japanese cultural
values are close to annihilation, so overall score
deteriorated since 1990.
4. Well-being
The score for individual well-being is relatively
high, as a certain level of quality of life is
attained in Japan. However, suicide rates at historic
high are extremely high compared to other OECD
countries. Growing wealth gap represented by individual
livelihood security is another sign of deteriorating
sustainability, so overall score for individual
well-being also deteriorates since 1990. Developing
a model society, where individuals can participate
and enjoy life without significant disparity irrespective
of age or sex, is an issue in the future.
|